In memory of Victoria Carter

Please donate to the hospice.

Copyright © . All rights reserved..

The great fire

of London 1666

The great fire of London - 1666.

London’s Burning! London’s Burning!,

fetch the engines! fetch the engines!

Fire fire! Fire Fire!, Pour on water! pour on water!

Ashes to ashes

London has had mThe great fire of Londonany serious fires during the course of it's lifetime. The earliest of which we have definite knowledge occurred in 60 AD, during the revolt led by Queen Boudica, who completely destroyed Roman Londinium. This fire was so fierce that archaeologists still use the layer of ash left by the flames to date the strata below the city during excavation work.

Another fire broke out in 675, destroying the Saxon cathedral, which was built of wood. It was rebuilt with stone around 675-685. In 1087, during the reign of William Rufus. Much of the Norman city including Saint Paul's Cathedral (there have been four) was destroyed. Many other fires have been recorded, the largest killing 3000 people in 1212, but none had caused so much devastation to the City as the 1666 fire although luckily there were few human casualties this time.

Ignored warnings

The King’s baker

It starteThe great fire of Londond on a windy Sunday night in a city ravaged by the plague, on September 2nd 1666. In the premises belonging to Thomas Farriner’s, the King's bakers along Pudding Lane, one of the ovens is left burning. A small fire breaks out, spreads through the premises and quickly reaches the outside. Soon, aided by the wind, the whole building is blazing. Embers from the fire are caught by the strong breeze and deposited onto other buildings, which in turn caught fire. There had been blazes in the past, but this was to be the worst London had faced since the year 60 AD when the old Roman settlement of Londinium was destroyed.

The buildThe great fire of Londonings of the time were tightly packed. Every piece of available land had some structure on it. It was not long before the flames were spreading at an alarming rate. The danger had been seen years before, and an order issued by the governing bodies of the city, that only stone structures be erected with slate to be used as roofing material. Due to the expense of these materials, the order had been largely ignored and the use of tar and timber was the usual thing. This of course, aided the fire, and in conjunction with the wind soon had the whole of the city ablaze.

Lord Mayor’s woe

Razed to th e ground

The Lord MThe great fire of Londonayor at the time, Sir Thomas Bludworth when informed about the fire in it’s early stages, looked at it and is reputed to have remarked “Why, a maiden’s piss could put it out”. If indeed, he did utter those words then he couldn’t have been more mistaken! The very next day he was found in a state of shock, pacing endlessly up and down, muttering to himself “What am I going to do, what am I going to do?”

It was toThe great fire of London take four days to bring the blaze under control, eventually by demolishing buildings in it's path to stop the spread of the inferno. By this time it was too late. Only a few structures remained with as much as eighty per cent of the city just a pile of smoking ruins. Amazingly enough, according to some sources, there were no fatalities. Another source says that the death toll numbered eight. Which account is accurate, I cannot say, but either way, it is miraculous that many hundreds were not killed by the blaze.

Samuel Pepys' notes

Even thSamuel Pepyse great diarist Samuel Pepys did not see any cause for alarm when his attention was drawn to the blaze. An excerpt from his entry for that day reads:

“Some of our maids sitting up late last night to get things ready against our feast today, Jane called up about three in the morning, to tell us of a great fire they saw in the City. So I rose, and slipped on my nightgown and went to her window, and thought it to be on the back side of Mark Lane at the farthest; but, being unused to such fires as followed, I thought it far enough off, and so went to bed again, and to sleep.”

Pepys had plenty more to write about the inferno in the days that followed.

The London Gazette, a weekly newspaper of the time, had much to report on the subject. The first two pages of this issue were devoted to the fire.

Read newspaper article about the fire.>> Or read John Evelyn’s account of it >>

Rebuilding London

Eighty peThe great fire of Londonrcent of the City had been ravaged by the fire. Immediate action had to be taken to get the rebuilding under way, a massive task. Within days of the burning of London Christopher Wren had submitted his designs to the King for the complete rebuilding of the city. The drawings showed a uniform geometric layout, with wide, straight main streets and the smaller streets branching off at right angles with square blocks of buildings. The expense, if this plan had been put into operation, would have been enormous, and it was duly refused. Instead, Wren got the go ahead to work on plans for the churches. eighty nine of these had been destroyed in the fire, and most of the ones we see standing today were built to the designs of Sir Christopher Wren’s office. His most famous ecclesiastical landmark being Saint Paul’s Cathedral, with it's massive unsupported dome.

Sir Christopher Wren

Sir ChristopSir Christopher Wrenher Wren was not originally an architect. He was a scientist and founder member of the Royal Society. While in his early thirties he had taken an interest in the design and construction of buildings and thought he would like to try his hand. Due to having the advantage of having an uncle in a position of high authority he was able to get his name put forward for the designing of several buildings outside London. These including the Sheldonian Theatre in Oxford and the Pembroke College Chapel, Cambridge. This put him in good stead when other “contracts” were being handed out.

He, with much input from Robert Hooke, designed the Monument to the great fire, which can still be seen on Fish Street Hill in the City. It measures 202 feet high. This is also the distance from where it stands, to where the fire started. His first design was to have had a statue of the King atop of it. Not wishing to be remembered along with the disaster, the King had this changed and the golden flames were used instead, as you can still see today.

The social and economic problems created by the disaster were overwhelming. Evacuation from London and resettlement elsewhere were strongly encouraged by Charles II, who feared a London rebellion amongst the dispossessed refugees. Despite numerous radical proposals, London was reconstructed on essentially the same street plan used before the fire. Fire image gallery >>


A qualified City of London tour guide.

Click for details

Affordable website and logo design

for the small business.